Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.
And also:
In the long run we are all dead.
-both quotes, John Maynard Keynes, 1883 - 1946
Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.
And also:
In the long run we are all dead.
-both quotes, John Maynard Keynes, 1883 - 1946
What do the following have in common?
Weaker-Dart
Addles-Beckon
Boast-Draft
Pallor-Gene
Banish-Gloss
Planer-Groves
Video-Bench
Driver-Wapiti
Sultry-Floods
Zodiac-Winnow
Blare-Bagel
Apexes-Amulet
Cola-Shrub
They are all the unique passwords I received over the past 2 weeks from AOL to redeem 1000 free hours. Yes, in two weeks while away on Grand Jury duty, I received 13,000 free hours of AOL use. I’m sure somewhere on the internet is a collection of all the stupid passwords they use. Feel free to help yourself to any of the above.
Last night someone broke into my car. Yes, my plastic Geo Tracker. Some genius took a razor blade to my plastic window, cut it open, unlocked the door and ransacked with glee. They didn’t take anything, because the last idiot who broke in 4 months ago already has my radio/CD player.
Now, what I’d like to know is this: what exactly do people think I have in my car? It’s plastic. The windows, if you can call them that, are made of plastic and flag more than an American flag in the wind. With that as my only line of defense, what would I be hiding in my car? Gold bullion from that Spanish dive expedition to uncover long lost treasures from the Roman empire? Or maybe jack-freaking-squat because my windows are PLASTIC!
Listen, you crooks out there need to use your noggin. Plastic cars don’t yield bounty.
Seems there’s a crazy rumor circulating the Internet that African-Americans’ voting rights will end in 2007. Just in case, you’ve never seen the U.S. Constitution or bought into this garbage for some other reason, here’s a brief explanation as to why this is untrue.
Section One of the 15th Amendment to the United States Constitution reads: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” This portion of the Constitution, applicable to both the states and national government, gives African-Americans the right to vote. There is NO TIME LIMIT on this VOTING RIGHT.
However, despite this clearly-stated portion of the Constitution, numerous spurious and illegal tactics were used prior to 1965 to deny African-Americans the opportunity to vote. These tactics included requiring the ownership of land, literacy tests, educational achievement tests, and more. The Voting Rights Act of 1965, along with its amendments and extensions, was enacted to ensure fair voting practices for all eligible citizens. In other words, the Act placed an onus on the U.S. government to police states and localities to ensure that U.S. citizens could properly exercise their enumerated right to vote.
Why then is there confusion about African Americans losing the right to vote in 2007? Fred McBride, Southern Regional Director for the Center for Voting and Democracy, theorizes that Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act is the seed in this garden of confusion.
In an essay posted at the Center for Voting and Democracy Web site, McBride says, “Section 5 applies to Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, and parts of Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho, and North Carolina. These areas [called covered jurisdictions] must submit any voting changes to the US Attorney General [the Department of Justice.] These changes can include but are not limited to: changes in the location of a polling place, changing an elected position to an appointive one, changing the existing voting system, etc.”
What does this mean? It means only that in 2007, if Section 5 is not extended, the aforementioned covered jurisdictions will no longer be required to submit voting changes to the Department of Justice. This will not destroy rights granted by the U.S. Constitution. It could, however, mean that new spurious tactics might be used to weaken the VOTING STRENGTH of minorities. For instance, elected positions can become appointed positions, redistricting can occur, and more.
This possibility, which is all it is at this point, also means that each of us needs to know our representatives and his/her stance on voting rights issues. Call, write, email, or visit your representatives to voice your belief that the Voting Rights Act should not only be extended, but enacted to eliminate any future need for extension. (And if you haven’t heard this before, don’t believe everything you read on the Internet. In fact, I suggest you verify this very post by doing your own research.)