The New Political Dictionary

It’s very difficult keeping up with Mideast news due to the Orwellian newspeak coming from Washington. So here’s a handy list of key terms, translated into simple English.

Liberation - Invasion.

Coalition - The U.S. and British invaders, plus some troops from rent-a-nations like Romania and Poland. In the past, “the coalition” would have been called imperial forces and mercenary auxiliaries.

Dictator - A ruler you don’t like, or who does not cooperate.

Statesman - A cooperative dictator.

Stability - when things go the way Uncle Sam likes, ie., the status quo.

Instability - when things don’t go the way Unc Sam wants, ie., when trouble-makers try to change the status quo.

Iraq reconstruction - a process whereby big firms that contribute to the president’s re-election campaign obtain contracts to rebuild the damage caused by U.S. bombing.

Freeing Iraq’s oil assets - Washington’s seizure and sale of Iraqi oil, which in no way can be compared to Cuba’s seizure and sale of U.S.-owned property, a dastardly crime.

Mideast democracy - regimes that hold rigged elections and obey Washington’s orders.

Free trade - pouring goods and services into the newly “liberated” country, and buying up its key industrial assets at fire-sale prices.

Terrorism - violent acts by dangerous fanatics and malcontents who refuse to accept the downtrodden status assigned to them by Washington.

Anti-terrorism - State terrorism.

Uranium - a yellowish mineral from Niger that causes red faces in the White House.

Iraq Administrator - A pro-consul or gaulieter, disguised as a minor suburban bureaucrat.

Drones of death - Iraqi remotely piloted aircraft that the White House claimed were poised to fly off Iraqi ships lurking in the North Atlantic and shower fiendish germs on a sleeping America - which turn out to be two model airplanes, only one of which could fly. See “vans of death.”

Vans of death - Claimed by Washington to be Iraqi mobile germ warfare laboratories, but turn out, on inspection, to be British-supplied trucks for inflating weather balloons.

Weapons of Mass Destruction - Nasty weapons, existing or non-existing, that the other side has. When your side has them, they become invisible.

Torture - a foul act committed by your enemies. When your side does it, it’s called intensive interrogation in Guantanamo.

Homeland security - bolting the barn door after the horse has escaped by rounding up Muslims and denying them due process of law.

French - Insubordinate ingrates and depraved chain-smokers who had the nerve to try to block the jolly little war in Iraq, and now sneer, “we told you so.”

Germans - Untrustworthy. Just when you order them to be warlike again, they go soft. Wait until they see the next dozen WWII epics from Hollywood.

Canadians - A bunch of pot-smoking, pinko, wimp nancy boys who marry their best friends and refuse to obey orders from the Great White Father in Washington.

Islam - An evil faith that promotes violence and hatred, as proven by the Rev. Jimmy Swaggart, who learned about the agents of the devil while encountering them in motel rooms.

Fox News - The Ministry of Truth.

Al-Jazeera News - All the bad news we don’t want to hear. See Fox News.

Die-hards and Saddam loyalists - Any Iraqis opposing the invasion of their country.

Traitors and friends of Saddam - Journalists who questioned the Bush Administration’s lurid claims over Iraq’s purported threat.

Moderate - A Mideastern ruler who toes the line and makes nice to Israel.

Peacekeepers - Troops from browbeaten or bribed vassal states sent to perform garrison duty in U.S.-occupied
nations that the Pentagon wants to avoid, or lacks the troops to perform.

New Iraqi government - An august body that leaps to its feet when a U.S. soldier enters the room, and has total authority over garbage collection and sewers.

Saddam Hussein - A former close American ally who got too big for his britches. If not assassinated, may soon be needed again to run Iraq for Washington.

Uday and Qusay - Yes, Saddam’s boys were big-time delinquents, but Crazy Uday’s biggest mistake was probably making fun of George W. Bush in his newspaper, calling the prez a draft-dodging wimp. Perhaps that’s why he and Qusay got the multi, anti-tank missile treatment - Texas justice - rather than a nice show trial in Baghdad.

Eye-Raq - A democracy-seeking Arab state that volunteered for mentoring and tutelage from Washington
in exchange for helping out American drivers of SUV’s.

D
July 29th, 2003 4:05 pm

Wow. Did Saddam start working for the Llamas. Yes U.S. policy isn’t perfect, but I will bet all the tea in China (is there a lot of tea there?) that Iraq’s policies are better now than they were six months ago. I hope and pray and believe the people in Iraq will be better off in the long run. Did they ask us to come and liberate them? Yes, but everyone who asked and who we tried to help rise up against their glorious leader were killed and are buried in mass graves. It would have been much easier for the U.S. to just stay at home and worry about our economy and can we buy that new car, but we didn’t, we tried to help the people of Iraq. Politics will always screw it up but I would rather live under the political tyrants of the U.S. than any other country.

Jetteva
July 30th, 2003 8:18 am

Am I glad Saddam and his sons are gone? Yep. They were horrible people. Am I glad my president either extrapolated the truth or flat out lied? NO! The ends never justify the means. Period. Especially when you are President. If Clinton can be impeached over a blowjob, then we can, at the very least, raise questions about Bush’s actions.

We often post things for the sake of discussion, whether we believe in what we post or not. That’s the idea of a site based around discussion of news and events. Someone has to start the converstation.

You’re comment about Saddam is a little harsh. We are not Saddam lovers. Ooops, I’ll be right back. My house winch is complaining again. Time to stuff her back into the nail-lined coffin.

akasha
August 20th, 2003 2:55 pm

I found your definition of “Canadians” hilarious. Yes, I am one of those Canuck freaks. As a Canadian, I personally get tired of Canada being referred to as “America Jr” and expected to ask, “How high?” when the Great US of A says, “Jump!”. Anyway, I think you might get a chuckle from the following article (I’ll circulate Canadian propaganda whenever I get an opportunity)! :)
PITTSBURGH POST-GAZETTE “It’s not just the weather that’s cooler in Canada”

Wednesday, July 30, 2003

You live next door to a clean-cut, quiet guy. He never plays loud music or throws raucous parties. He doesn’t gossip over the fence, just smiles politely and offers you some tomatoes. His lawn is cared-for, his house is neat as a pin and you get the feeling he doesn’t always lock his front door. He wears Dockers. You hardly know he’s there.

And then one day you discover that he has pot in his basement, spends his weekends at peace marches and that guy you’ve seen mowing the yard is his spouse.

Allow me to introduce Canada.

The Canadians are so quiet that you may have forgotten they’re up there, but they’ve been busy doing some surprising things. It’s like discovering that the mice you are dimly aware of in your attic have been building an espresso machine.

Did you realize, for example, that our reliable little tag-along brother never joined the Coalition of the Willing? Canada wasn’t willing, as it turns out, to join the fun in Iraq. I can only assume American diner menus weren’t angrily changed to include “freedom bacon,” because nobody here eats the stuff anyway.

And then there’s the wild drug situation: Canadian doctors are authorized to dispense medical marijuana. Parliament is considering legislation that would not exactly legalize marijuana possession, as you may have heard, but would reduce the penalty for possession of under 15 grams to a fine, like a speeding ticket. This is to allow law enforcement to concentrate resources on traffickers; if your garden is full of wasps, it’s smarter to go for the nest rather than trying to swat every individual bug. Or, in the United States, bong.

Now, here’s the part that I, as an American, can’t understand. These poor benighted pinkos are doing everything wrong. They have a drug problem: Marijuana offenses have doubled since 1991. And Canada has strict gun control laws, which means that the criminals must all be heavily armed, the law-abiding civilians helpless and the government on the verge of a massive confiscation campaign. (The laws have been in place since the ’70s, but I’m sure the government will get around to the confiscation eventually.) They don’t even have a death penalty!

And yet … nationally, overall crime in Canada has been declining since 1991. Violent crimes fell 13 percent in 2002. Of course, there are still crimes committed with guns — brought in from the United States, which has become the major illegal weapons supplier for all of North America — but my theory is that the surge in pot-smoking has rendered most criminals too relaxed to commit violent crimes. They’re probably more focused on shoplifting boxes of Ho-Hos from convenience stores.

And then there’s the most reckless move of all: Just last month, Canada decided to allow and recognize same-sex marriages. Merciful moose, what can they be thinking? Will there be married Mounties (they always get their man!)? Dudley Do-Right was sweet on Nell, not Mel! We must be the only ones who really care about families. Not enough to make sure they all have health insurance, of course, but more than those libertines up north.

This sort of behavior is a clear and present danger to all our stereotypes about Canada. It’s supposed to be a cold, wholesome country of polite, beer-drinking hockey players, not founded by freedom-fighters in a bloody revolution but quietly assembled by loyalists and royalists more interested in order and good government than liberty and independence.

But if we are the rugged ndividualists, why do we spend so much of our time trying to get everyone to march in lockstep? And if Canadians are so reserved and moderate, why are they so progressive about letting people do what they want to?

Canadians are, as a nation, less religious than we are, according to polls. As a result, Canada’s government isn’t influenced by large, well-organized religious groups and thus has more in common with those of Scandinavia than those of the United States, or, say, Iran.

Canada signed the Kyoto global warming treaty, lets 19-year-olds drink, has more of its population living in urban areas and accepts more immigrants per capita than the United States.

These are all things we’ve been told will wreck our society. But I guess Canadians are different, because theirs seems oddly sound.

Like teenagers, we fiercely idolize individual freedom but really demand that everyone be the same. But the Canadians seem more adult — more secure. They aren’t afraid of foreigners. They aren’t afraid of homosexuality. Most of all, they’re not afraid of each other.

I wonder if America will ever be that cool.

Martin
November 3rd, 2003 12:07 am

I won’t mince any words when I say that DUBYA is a liar, when he claimed that a “Bush Administration would reach out to the World’s Nations in friendly NON-Arrogant manner.”