… If We Have to Beat it Out of You!

In the last day, the Red Cross has accused the U.S. of torturing prisoners in Guantanamo Bay, The Washington Post has reported that Army Generals knew of abuse in Iraq since December 2003, and the Center for Constitutional Rights in Germany has accused U.S. officials of war crimes.

In a confidential report, the Red Cross concluded the U.S. has been intentionally using psychological and physical coercion “tantamount to torture” on prisoners at Guantanamo Bay.

In another confidential report, leaked to the Post, investigators warned Army generals in Iraq that members of an elite military and CIA task force were abusing detainees. This finding was delivered more than a month before investigators received the Abu Ghraib prison photographs.

Finally, in Germany, the Center for Constitutional Rights filed a criminal complaint on behalf of four Iraqi citizens. These citizens allege that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Former CIA Director George Tenet, among other U.S. officials, committed war crimes in Iraq. Germany’s laws on torture and war crimes permit the prosecution of suspected war criminals wherever they may be found.

No doubt the alleged abuses now coming to light will grow, since our current nominee for attorney general, Alberto Gonzales, helped the Bush Administration develop the idea of unlimited presidential power to seize and hold enemy combatants—without access to lawyers or judicial proceedings. Gonzales is also the advisor who sent a 2002 memo to the president that termed “quaint” many Geneva Conventions provisions, including individual hearings.

Tiffany
December 2nd, 2004 3:31 pm

Just adding some background. The International Committee of the Red Cross, ICRC, not the American Red Cross is the humanitarian aid group that has documented the abuses. This is an important distinction because the ICRC acts as a neutral body holding agreements with the major countries around the world, including the US, that give them access to POWs, enemy combatants, etc. as long as their findings are kept confidential. This report was leaked because the Pentagon is publicly stating that the presence of the Red Cross (no doubt they incorrectly citing the organization deliberately) means that the prisoners in Guantanamo Bay are being treated well. As you can see, this puts the ICRC in quite a position. The US Government is using the good name of the ICRC to deliberately mislead the public. Apparently someone thought that the abuses that are being practiced at Gitmo are severe enough to break the decades old stance of neutrality. It will be interesting to see if the ICRC is welcomed back to Gitmo any time soon.

Randy
December 2nd, 2004 6:39 pm

If this is all true, how come we’re not seeing any major news organizations covering it?

Tiffany
December 2nd, 2004 10:59 pm

I presume that you are referring to television networks when you say “major news organizations.” Well, you aren’t going to hear about it on TV until enough people make enough noise. I wouldn’t expect to see it until the weekend or Monday, if it takes off, and on the news ticker at that. The New York Times ran a story on 11.30, http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/30/politics/30gitmo.html , and the ICRC response is here, http://www.icrc.org/Web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/iwpList4/C5667B446C9A4DF7C1256F5C00403967 . Talk radio, namely Unfiltered and The Randi Rhodes on Air America, internet blogs, and newspapers especially the foreign papers are your best sources of reliable information nowadays. The mainstream media has resorted to reporting spin as fact in an effort to shake the “liberal media stigma” imposed by the radical right wing in this country. And if by chance you actually believe the mainstream media is liberal, visit http://mediamatters.org/ they nail all the networks and http://www.fair.org/ nails newspapers and networks.

Randy
December 21st, 2004 11:19 am

Okay, you might have a point, and you might be right, but, frankly, I’m far too lazy to click on and read all those links.