<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schiavo, Congress and the Constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spittingllamas.com/2005/03/31/schiavo-congress-and-the-constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spittingllamas.com/2005/03/31/schiavo-congress-and-the-constitution/</link>
	<description>To the hilt!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://spittingllamas.com/2005/03/31/schiavo-congress-and-the-constitution/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 03:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spittingllamas.com/?p=845#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>Then, with any luck, it means that not all republicans are power hungry and trying to control everything they can get their hands on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then, with any luck, it means that not all republicans are power hungry and trying to control everything they can get their hands on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://spittingllamas.com/2005/03/31/schiavo-congress-and-the-constitution/#comment-1821</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 02:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spittingllamas.com/?p=845#comment-1821</guid>
		<description>Bush has a habit of calling a judge an "activist judge" if he doesn't like the way the judge rules.

What's interesting is he, nor anyone in congress, used that term this week. Why? Most of the judges involved in the case were republican appointees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush has a habit of calling a judge an &#8220;activist judge&#8221; if he doesn&#8217;t like the way the judge rules.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s interesting is he, nor anyone in congress, used that term this week. Why? Most of the judges involved in the case were republican appointees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://spittingllamas.com/2005/03/31/schiavo-congress-and-the-constitution/#comment-1820</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spittingllamas.com/?p=845#comment-1820</guid>
		<description>Its because Congress is grossly overstepping their authority and think that they can meddle in the affairs of individuals and that they make the laws so they aren't bound by higher laws.  At least the court upheld the constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its because Congress is grossly overstepping their authority and think that they can meddle in the affairs of individuals and that they make the laws so they aren&#8217;t bound by higher laws.  At least the court upheld the constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
